ID:1440412
 
Applies to:DM Language
Status: Open

Issue hasn't been assigned a status value.
Could we have support for more than .tff files for skin elements? .fon formatted files are so much better at maintaining bitmap fonts than .tff files are, and that's why I'd prefer to use .fon files than .tff files for my skins.
+1
Also, can we work on getting fonts less "fuzzy" when scaled up?
Bumping, this would be appreciated and doesn't sound all that infeasible.
With a default resolution of 32x32 bitmap fonts (.fon) can look much nicer and cleaner than TrueType (.ttf).
This is still relevant to my desires.
That's probably doable for DS, but I don't think .fon files would ever be webclient-friendly. I'm planning to add TTF/OTF support to the webclient, as well as WOFF.
In response to Lummox JR
Thanks Lummox! Bitmap fonts are just so much cleaner for use in interfaces.
In response to Oasiscircle
I should clarify: Although using .fon files is probably doable in DS, I have no immediate plans to add it. If anything that'd be adding a new feature that DS can use that the webclient can't, which I really would rather avoid. It makes far more sense to me to up the webclient's game by allowing it to handle embedded fonts.