Descriptive Problem Summary: Images, at full size are over-sized when posting them on the forums.
Numbered Steps to Reproduce Problem: Post an image on the forum?
Expected Results: An automatic re-sized image.
Actual Results: Scroll down below to Flame Sage's post.
ID:254188
Feb 5 2012, 8:53 pm (Edited on Feb 6 2012, 1:44 pm)
|
|||||||||||||
Resolved
| |||||||||||||
#2 Feb 6 2012, 5:12 am
|
|
I think he means large images like.
![]() | |
#3 Feb 6 2012, 1:43 pm
|
|
I'm referring to Flame Sage's image, over-sized images don't shrink to size to fit the post layout.
| |
#4 Feb 6 2012, 2:07 pm
|
|
Easy fix using width and height in the img tag yourself ...
Or Tom could easily add this to the style sheet ... | |
#5 Feb 6 2012, 2:38 pm
|
|
This has been partially fixed (it was already done in an earlier update that just didn't come across yet for some reason), except that replies don't show scrollbars; that'll be in later.
The only problem with auto-shrinking the image is that adding max-width to the CSS for images only works if the image is not subject to other considerations like (for instance) whether it's contained in another element from complex formatting. I do think it makes tons of sense as a general rule though since at worst we're scaling down to the very biggest we would ever allow, so I'll see about popping that in. | |
#6 Feb 6 2012, 3:36 pm
|
|
Can you not make a "thumbnail" as other image hosting sites provide this instead of displaying the image as a whole and use the lightbox to show the full image?
Like screenshot's on game listings .. | |
#7 Feb 6 2012, 4:27 pm
|
|
You're confused on who's creating the content. The <img> tag above was put into the post by Flame Sage, and wasn't a chunk of HTML given to him by an image host. Turning the tag he already wrote into a thumbnail is a completely different animal.
| |
#8 Feb 6 2012, 5:59 pm
|
|
True.
| |
#9 Feb 6 2012, 8:11 pm
|
|
Lummox JR resolved issue
| |
#10 Feb 6 2012, 8:25 pm
|
|
Nice job!
| |
#11 Feb 6 2012, 9:27 pm
|
|
Fabulous.
| |
Flame Sage wrote:
I think he means large images like. My llama is now smaller, but when I go to Reply to Post, it becomes large again and goes off the page. Seems like that update didn't propagate to the Preview view. | |
#13 Feb 6 2012, 10:27 pm
|
|
Indeed it does not propagate to the preview. Or rather it does, but it doesn't account for the preview's more limited width. There's a separate issue for the "Original post" part of replying. I'll fix that in a later style change; it's pretty straightforward.
| |


Images work fine on here...
Yep works fine.
Picture size 400x400 original here - http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_I2uQkGxIykM/TUzOwgzrmYI/ AAAAAAAAOQ0/CI-T9-MZg-I/s1600/jelly+sofa.jpg