mob/verb/Test()
if(usr.contents.Find(/obj/hello,1,0))
usr<<"Hi!"
ok i have a /obj/hello in my contents but it dosn't say hi back?
i also tried this but it didnt work
mob/verb/Test()
for(var/n in usr.contents)
if(n==/obj/hello)
usr<<"Hi!"
ID:266537
 Apr 4 2002, 3:53 am
|
|
There's a proc that's meant for searching procs/verbs; it's called hascall() check it out. But yes the example you were just shown can be used for verbs with some modification to it.
| |
Strange Kidd wrote:
would it work the same way if you replaces contents with verbs? Here's the funny part: The verbs list actually is made of type paths, so the code you had would work for that (although you'd have to search for things like /mob/verb/Jump instead) even though it didn't work for usr.contents. Although it doesn't have to be this way, lists usually contain only one type of thing. A contents list contains atoms; if you want to find a specific one, Find() or == will do, but if you want to find one by its object type you should use a for() loop, locate(), or istype(). The verbs list is actually made up of type paths pointing to various procs, so == and Find() are perfectly appropriate. (I didn't mention locate() in my last post, but it basically would work like this: var/n = locate(/obj/hello) in usr.contents The locate() proc is pretty versatile.) Lummox JR | |
This is because the items in your usr.contents list are actual objs, not type paths. If the list was a list of type paths, then this would work, but it's not.
That's the same problem. The statement if(n==/obj/hello) will always be false here because every value of n will be an atom (an obj), not a type path.
There are two ways to fix this. The worst way is to modify the n==/obj/hello line:
if(istype(n,/obj/hello))OR:
The best way to change this is to loop through only objects of type /obj/hello, which you can do:
Lummox JR