I usually make these objects to distinguish them from /obj and /mob.
furniture |
The problem is that BYOND doesn't allow me to map them. Why not?
ID:324385
Feb 22 2012, 6:02 am
|
|||||||
Not Feasible
| |||||||
I'd like to map /atom/movable objects aside from /obj and /mob through the map editor.
I usually make these objects to distinguish them from /obj and /mob.
The problem is that BYOND doesn't allow me to map them. Why not? | |||||||
#1 Feb 22 2012, 10:10 am (Edited on Feb 22 2012, 10:43 am)
|
|
I don't really think it's necessary. If you want movable objects to be mapped create instances from /obj or /mob explicitly.
| |
#2 Feb 22 2012, 10:31 am
|
|
Realistically speaking, /atom/movable doesn't really work as a parent type of anything but /obj and /mob. You have to pick one or the other. All you've really done here is create an unusual datum.
Since this is furniture, /obj is appropriate as a type. If you're doing this because /obj has verbs defined for things like going into inventory, you should make such objs a subtype like /obj/item. | |
#3 Feb 22 2012, 10:31 am
|
|
Lummox JR resolved issue (Not Feasible)
| |
#4 Feb 25 2012, 2:58 am
|
|
Then I can't exclude it in verbs with as obj parameters. :\
I thought such datum were fine since I can create and use instances during run-time without problem. | |