9/11, an event that never should have happened in a nation with the greatest defense network in the history of humanity, is still considered by some to be an attack by a handful of cave-dwelling Arabic terrorists, even though there's no evidence to support this claim. What evidence does exists suggest the attack was a false-flag event perpetrated by a rouge faction within our own government.
Deniers would have you believe that the official story is the only rational explanation, but these sheeple have never done their homework. They get their information from the mainstream media, the same media that knew these buildings were going to collapse, the "official" cause of the collapse and the evil terrorist "mastermind" who was behind it while the events were still unfolding. They don't bother to ask the hard questions, and attack anyone who does.
Police officers, firefighters, rescue personnel, news anchors and others on the ground and around the event not only claim to have witnessed explosions, but also predicted the collapse of the buildings themselves. Think about this for a minute. Emergency personnel and the media knew before it happened, that a collapse was going to take place. Never in the history of the world has any steel framed building collapsed due to fire. There is no precedent to make these people believe that fire could cause collapse. That's like predicting the collapse of the stock market based on information that isn't available until after the collapse.
These buildings fell in record time. This is enough to disprove the official story. If you believe a 110 story building can fall in 10 seconds without explosives, you should go back to your physics books. The official story claims that the floors failed one after another, crashing down on top of each other, even though the architecture of the towers makes this impossible. They claim that this "progressive collapse" explains the collapse, even though if such a collapse occurred, it would have taken much longer than 10 seconds to complete. Why? Because floors crashing down onto steel and concrete are acted on by an equal and opposing force. This means as the floors collapse, they are being opposed by the floors below. This resistance would add more time to the collapse, though as we have all seen, no resistance was ever met. The floors below the collapse acted as if they didn't exist, allowing the towers to fall at free-fall speed.
Watch. Listen. Question. Demand answers before it's too late. Your future is at risk, and your duty as a citizen of the free world requires you to be diligent. If you fail to hold your government accountable for this tragedy, you're no better than the Nazi appeasers from WWII.
Ignorant posts, personal attacks and disinformation will be removed without further warning, and the posters will be banned. Either discuss the facts calmly, or don't bother commenting.
Jun 29 2008, 10:18 am