.winset Nested Ternaries

ID:670029
 
Apr 14 2012, 12:43 pm (Edited on Apr 24 2012, 8:30 am)
Applies to:Dream Seeker
Status: Open
Issue hasn't been assigned a status value.
Ternary expressions used in .winset are currently very useful for simple things. For instance, if you would like to toggle the visibility of a window, you would do this.

.winset "window.is-visible=true ? window.is-visible=false : window.is-visible=true"

But what would you do if you wanted to toggle the visibility of a window, but only if another window is visible? I would expect to do this.

.winset "window2.is-visible=true ? window1.is-visible=true ? window.is-visible=false : window.is-visible=true"

This, though, does not work, and attempting to use nested ternaries can lead to unexpected results. In order to actually achieve this, you would have to use .winset to send a command verb to the server. That verb would have to winget() the windows' visibility, evaluate the same if-if-else expression, and then winset() the results. As you can see, this is not very intuitive.

I request that nested ternaries be supported for .winset, so that complex expressions can easily be evaluated client-side, without the need for a four-way trip.
Apr 20 2012, 9:10 am
The syntax here is wrong for a ternary; you have three ? operators and only one : operator. A ternary expression requires that each ? have a matching : and vice-versa.
Apr 20 2012, 10:30 am (Edited on Apr 20 2012, 11:48 am)
From the Skin Reference:
The choice2 item is optional.
.winset "bigbutton.is-checked=true ? window.background-color=#ff0000"

Besides, there are only two ?s and it doesn't work even when you do use the optional choice.
Jan 13 2013, 6:05 am
Did you not read my post? A) The skin reference says otherwise. B) It works without. C) Nesting doesn't work at any rate. Lummox and I had this discussion (not here) in full, a long time ago.