As I made mention in my post yesterday, I went to Warrnambool with my father.
This trip involves what is a tradition with the McDonald family, that's right, we went to McDonalds (we don't have one in Portland). It's cheap, it's easy, it's effective.
So while waiting for the meal (see, it's a restaurant now, they deliver to you, but this is another rant) I noticed a kid exit the bathroom with his mother, she was holding antibacterial soap stuff and told him to hold out his hands. The kid had clearly wet hands, indicating he'd already washed them. This was before their meal.
Just my luck, that particular family sat next to me. Four kids and their mother. I was talking to my father about how all this antibacterial soap parents are forcing their kids to use will compromise their immune system which will lead to health problems in the future. I hoped I was talking just loud enough that she would overhear me. Clearly she didn't.
As they were about to leave, she made all four kids apply this soap stuff, and then told one off for touching a chair saying "you'll get germs", and had him wash his hands again. In her defence, touching a chair in a McDonalds restaurant will probably lead to a sickness of some kind to anyone who doesn't have a developed immune system, but still.
This kind of event is all to common in Australia. The current health boom is resulting in many things. Alcohol taxes (premixed drinks were in the case prices for a six pack, this worsened the problem, as it was now cheaper to buy the bottle of spirits and the soft-drink, leading to unmeasured drinks. Way to go genius'), cigarette taxes (americans pay five odd dollars, we pay upwards of eight for local brands and upwards of ten for imported for a standard pack of 20, at least in rural Australia) and a now proposed junk food tax (I'm so glad I didn't vote for this guy).
This is all after they force government schools to remove anything with sugar. This happened the year after I graduated (YES). If it had happened while I was in school, I wouldn't have been able to function. Without caffeinated sugar water of some kind, I'd fall asleep in class in no time. And this removal wasn't just from the canteens, kids actually aren't allowed to bring junk food to school (or anything that has nuts in it). The secondary college I went to, rebelled by instead adding a coffee machine (that does tea and hot chocolate) outside the year 7 locker room. That school was fantastic, it really was.
So we're sending our next generation backwards in the evolutionary scale, because we're wiping out their immune system, and we're making everything that makes life just that little bit fun incredibly expensive.
(You voted for Rudd, didn't you Jp? You too Crispy? Though I'm pretty sure Dark View voted for The Hulk.)
#1 Sep 23 2009, 9:48 pm
|
|
I see this often, I don't understand why people have these phobias to constantly wash their hands with antibacterial soap as well as forcing their children to do so. It's reprehensible to understand it I guess.
| |
#2 Sep 23 2009, 9:49 pm
|
|
I've always thought it was good to get sick, even though most people view it as a bad thing. It helps build your immune system by fighting. But this situation, is just.... wow. I don't think most people understand the real meaning of having anti-bacteria products.
10 Years Later: "Teenager dies from cold, immune system too weak." | |
#3 Sep 23 2009, 9:51 pm
|
|
It's all too common as PerfectGoku said.
It doesn't really effect the thirty-something mothers who've been doing it since they got pregnant, because they have an immune system (and obviously no common sense), so they assume because they don't get sick as often as they used to, making their kids do the same thing will keep them well and ultimately make them healthier. | |
#4 Sep 23 2009, 10:13 pm
|
|
There's a product selling on TV in America that seriously upset my stomach the first time I saw it; I got that sinking feeling and blank forward stare I imagine people get when they first notice a mushroom cloud rising in the distance.
The product? It's a vacuum cleaner with built in UV light to kill germs. Before I continue, think really hard about that for a moment. Hopefully you've run down the same scenario in your mind that immediately occurred to me: 1. Vacuum makes sweep over LARGE SURFACE AREA killing all organisms, benign and harmful, in that area... except the resistant ones. 2. Resistant organisms quickly repopulate the rug, now prime real-estate. 3. Resistant organisms spread new genes that were mutated as a result of the FRIGGIN ULTRA VIOLET RADIATION we subjected them to. 4. Repeat. 5. Humanity dies from outbreak of zombism. It's like those computer programs you can download which donate unused CPU cycles to model protein folding, but you're donating your rug to the cause of breeding super germs. | |
#5 Sep 23 2009, 10:17 pm
|
|
In theory, condition 5 will never come true, as condition 4 results in going back to condition 1. ;)
| |
#6 Sep 23 2009, 10:21 pm
|
|
Tiberath wrote:
In theory, condition 5 will never come true, as condition 4 results in going back to condition 1. ;) I considered whether or not I wanted to be strict with my control flow, and decided that it would only detract from the post. One the reasons for my conclusion was that I could think of no suitable exit condition for the loop that wouldn't give away the punch line. The closest I got was "Repeat N times", but that isn't any more valid because N is never specified. Any suggestions? | |
#7 Sep 23 2009, 10:53 pm
|
|
I'm looking forward to #5. ;]
| |
#8 Sep 23 2009, 11:00 pm
|
|
IainPeregrine wrote:
Any suggestions? Not worry about it. Anyone who falls into the categories of people we rant about wont realise it's an endless loop. =D | |
#9 Sep 23 2009, 11:24 pm
|
|
Tiberath wrote:
In theory, condition 5 will never come true, as condition 4 results in going back to condition 1. ;) Everyone knows number 5 is real. Why do you think they make movies about them. To warn us about what will happen. | |
#10 Sep 24 2009, 12:30 am
|
|
Rip Nation wrote:
Tiberath wrote: I think you missed the joke I was making. | |
#11 Sep 24 2009, 2:27 am
|
|
Your mysophobic description of Australia has destroyed all of my favorite preconceptions about "the outback." Hate.
You're damn lucky you blokes still talk with cool accents and made up words. Edit: I don't know if "the outback" is in specific reference to particular parts of Australia that you're not describing, it's just that I've always taken it to summarize Australia as a whole. | |
#12 Sep 24 2009, 2:34 am
|
|
IainPeregrine wrote:
Any suggestions? Suggestion highlighted in bold. 4. Repeat, until... 5. Humanity dies from outbreak of zombism. | |
#13 Sep 24 2009, 2:57 am
|
|
I've caught alot of mild diseases... I think it makes me better off :) I'm proud to announce I had Denge fever :P
Germs are good for you :) | |
#14 Sep 24 2009, 4:57 am
|
|
Kurado: The Outback is traditionally used to refer to the big fucking desert in the middle of Australia, rather than to the place as a whole - cities don't count.
Tib: Actually, I voted for the Greens, but same thing, really. I don't agree with all of his policies - of course, the clean feed is completely bonkers, the ETS has been crippled by political concerns (Mustn't upset big business by making them accountable for their pollution!), etc. But I maintain that he is utterly, positively, definitively better than Howard would have been (And it would have been Howard. He wouldn't have stepped down for Costello under any circumstances). The Libs minus Howard are still managing some epic stupidity, too - Turnbull complaining Rudd's ETS is more about politics than saving the environment (true, but given that Turnbull wants to let industry off even /more/...), attacks on the current government over recent asylum seeker arrivals (OH FFS STOP TRYING TO SCORE POLITICAL POINTS BY DEMONISING REFUGEES), attacks on the stimulus package without really proposing a better alternative (Here I will admit to not having the expertise or knowledge to judge - but the Libs didn't tell us what their sensible course of action is), bitching about how the economy was so great under Howard and that Rudd has tanked it (Howard, of course, presiding over some of Australia's most favourable economic conditions (thanks in part to reforms via Keating), and Rudd being hit by the global financial crisis. And Howard's economy wasn't as good as it could have been), bitching about the new broadband network, bitching about splitting up Telstra, etc. Basically, lesser of two evils, I wish it could have been the Greens (Or maybe the Democrats of ~a decade ago, prior to all the infighting), at least Family First only has one vote in the Senate. | |
#15 Sep 24 2009, 5:41 am (Edited on Sep 24 2009, 6:24 am)
|
|
Jp wrote:
at least Family First only has one vote in the Senate. This statement, I'll drink to. Oh yes, and good old Mr Malcolm is an absolute dickhead. I wont deny this. | |
#16 Sep 24 2009, 7:16 am
|
|
Kuraudo wrote:
Suggestion highlighted in bold. Unnecessary, "5. Humanity dies from outbreak of zombism.", the infinite loop ends there already. | |
#17 Sep 24 2009, 8:18 am
|
|
The infinent loop never reaches condition 5 however. Once it gets to condition 4, it jumps straight back to condition 1.
| |
#18 Sep 24 2009, 1:46 pm
|
|
for fucks sake i ate bugs when i was a kid, and I'm healthy >_>
| |
#19 Sep 24 2009, 2:49 pm
|
|
See, this is why I like the original so much better. Just like in every scenario portrayed in media thus far, the zombie outbreak comes out of the clear blue sky with no "until..." to give it away. Sure, it makes no sense from a loop structure point of view, but they're friggin zombies.
| |