One of the most asked questions in philosophy.
"Why do we exist?"
The answer looks like it's simple, but as they say, looks can be deceiving.
Would a mere answer like "To live our lives." be enough, or should it be more complicated like "To reach a certain goal."? Some people might feel like the answer is "To suffer until we die." when others feel like "To live happily ever after".
Me? I've never been the philosophy kind, so I don't ask myself that question to much. But if they would ever ask me. My answer would be right from my heart and to my current situation. Because the question "Why do we exist?" cannot be answered by facts, but only by opinions. When I might be mad, I might answer "To waste time." but when I'm really happy, I might be like "To enjoy life."
So basically: "Why do we exist?" is a question, that can only raise opinions and the answer is dependent on the mood of the person and how a person thinks.
I do know that Philosophy is a hard thing to talk about and it requires a bit of logic, if you don't really get what I was talking about. You really should re-read the post, if you look at Philosophy from a number of viewpoints/ways, you will find yourself in the midst of a whole universum of questions and answers. All of them are right and yet all of them are wrong. That is what makes Philosophy interesting.
I do not know how YOU think about it but I would gladly like to know what you think, share a comment if you'd like.