ID:2539140
 
Resolved
Using the "in" operator to test if something is in a list should now perform much better for most cases. Additionally, list.Find() will now perform better for turf and area contents.
Applies to:Dream Daemon
Status: Resolved (513.1508)

This issue has been resolved.
The in operator has been observed to be slower than list.Find() in some cases.
Lummox JR resolved issue with message:
Using the "in" operator to test if something is in a list should now perform much better for most cases. Additionally, list.Find() will now perform better for turf and area contents.
Awesome :D any news on overloading in?
I have no plans to overload "in". Doing so would really require some way of letting a datum treat itself as a list in a more general case.