Money Comparisons in Off Topic
|
|
(Awakening lives for his game!)
A few years ago I saw a game which, eventually spawned the idea that became Echelon. The only things the games have in common, really, are nice graphics and bumping pieces off the board. Aside from that, they aren't alike at all, if memory serves. Although, there is one big difference between them.
Subscribing to the other game, which had a 30 day trial, only supported 2 players, and had no online capabilities would cost you an entire $20.00.
Subscribing to Echelon would cost you an entire $0.20 or $0.50, it comes with online capabilities and supports up to four players.
Yet, absolutely no one bothers to subscribe to my game! I'm confused because I hear a lot of "this game's great!" comments, yet it's apparently not great enough to be worth 2-5 dimes. So, my question is: is there something about Echelon that warrants not subscribing? Maybe a general lack of BYONDimes? Or is this really just a sign of my impatience?
|
Most people are really stingy with BYONDimes because for some reason, many people have reached the conclusion that if it costs anything, it's not worth your time.
That's my main beef with Linuxers. No offense to intelligent Linuxers, of course, but most Linuxers have whatever money they have rammed so far up their arses that it is a really uncomfortable prospect for them to part with anything.
I have Linux too, but I have no qualms about paying for something good (unless, of course, it is out of my price range; $0.50 is not ;-).
I haven't bought Echelon simply because I haven't played it yet -- the only Echelon-related thing I've done is watch the game you saw me in. ;-) )
I normally hoard money and then go on spending sprees until I run down to around $100 or so. Which reminds me that I'm about due for a spending spree sometime soon...