In response to Audeuro (#19)
And that I will agree with!

Although the owner should still be able to go back and reject it at a later date ((Owner might have been on vacation, or etc))
IMO, being able to remove reviews is censure and/or obstruction of being able to view the review. Bad idea.

Players can vote if the review is accurate.
In response to Foomer (#15)
Its one thing if it is a constructive review, it is another when it is an attack. Being this is the Internet the latter outweighs the chances of it actually being constructive, the option of deleting somehting that shwos up on your hub that you cannot control would be sufficent. If the owner decides to delete poor reviews then that is their problem. Of course you could just play the game and experience it yourself, after all we are not paying to play these games which is kind of the purpose of a review, to prevent you from wasting your money.
In response to Kikaider (#22)
Kikaider wrote:
Its one thing if it is a constructive review, it is another when it is an attack.

Have you read the review in question? It pretty fairly covers aspects of gameplay as well as administration. The fact that Yurgeta was really behaving that way was confirmed by other commenters.

Of course you could just play the game and experience it yourself, after all we are not paying to play these games which is kind of the purpose of a review, to prevent you from wasting your money.

Or time, in this case.

Lummox JR
Page: 1 2