In response to Stephen001 (#5)
That's a pretty great analogy.
In response to AJX (#18)
AJX wrote:
And 600,000... So you have a considerably smaller map than I'd expect. Around 700x700.

That's also making assumptions about z-levels. If there were 4 z-levels, you reach 600,000 turfs (not even accounting for other types of objects) in a map around the size of 387x387x4.
In response to Kuraudo (#21)
Kuraudo wrote:
AJX wrote:
And 600,000... So you have a considerably smaller map than I'd expect. Around 700x700.

That's also making assumptions about z-levels. If there were 4 z-levels, you reach 600,000 turfs (not even accounting for other types of objects) in a map around the size of 387x387x4.

Precise there. lol.

Anyway~ Yes, that is correct.

Thats because 387x387 is 1/4 the size of 775x775. I said 700x700 instead of 775 to leave room for objects and such.
Page: 1 2