Prosecutor Edgeworth's Office

This video will scar you for life!

Fri, 16 May 2008 21:41:54 GMT

Most - Truthful - Statement - Ever!!!

Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:41:04 GMT

If you can state something, I can put "your mom" in front of it and it'll still make sense!

Anonymous does it again...

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:51:50 GMT

http://www.knbc.com/news/15132220/detail.html

Also, http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology

The New Site

Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:33:54 GMT

Well, I like what they did. The contrast is interesting, not too hard on the eyes, and the layout is optimal, in my view. And of course, since my view, and my word, IS all and everything, then what I say stands, and will always do.

[/this_tag_makes_all_negative_comments_null_and_void_so_HA!]

Milestone for DQ:NML - Spells & Items in battle = Functional

Wed, 26 Dec 2007 23:40:24 GMT

I've finally got some time (and motivation) to take on the long and tedious task of implementing the Spells & Items part to DQ:NML's battle engine!

Now that this part's mostly out of the way, this means we'll have more time & resources available to develop the game on both a storyline and features standpoint.

Feel free to hop in if you feel like it. Constructive feedback is always appreciated!

Ad Hominem

Thu, 29 Nov 2007 03:40:17 GMT

I know I might appear to be quite demanding by expecting intelligent responses to this, but here's the question nevertheless.

What's so great about aiming at the lowest common denominator? Especially when it comes to arguing?

Let me explain: In most discussions/flamewars I read lately, there was this common characteristic that stood out: at some point, participants would stop tackling the argument and go against the arguing party instead.

Hell, some of BYOND's "greatest arguers" seem to regularly use that on a more subtle level, and people tend fall in their trap. This is completely idiotic, as most of the time, there was no substance in the attack, and it simply leads the "victim" out of the argument, thus making the attacker's argument look better than it really is.

However, don't those people realize how valid (or how invalid) this type of argument really is?

So I ask again: what's so great about aiming at the lowest common denominator when arguing?

zOMG! THEY FOUND US!!!

Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:18:33 GMT

http://entmag.com/news/article.asp?EditorialsID=7955

More NES Metroid madness - WORKS TOO!

Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:14:05 GMT

Classic NES goofiness: Weird NES Metroid Password - IT ACTUALLY WORKS

Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:37:03 GMT

Try it...

Some thought I just had...

Sun, 16 Sep 2007 21:43:30 GMT

You know what private parts and opinions have in common? When you display them for the world to see, you're gonna get your ass handed to ya!

Why am I saying this? Because of a phenomenon that's as old as the internet itself: post opinion, receive flamewar.

Just had that thought when browsing through blogs, and seeing how it's impossible for people to just "agree to disagree".