We need some more games, guys! Start suggesting some, or I'll have to pick some out, and I'm sure my opinion differs from everyone else's.

Now, the point of this post: Lets get started reviewing. I thought about it for a bit, and decided that reviews should include a few bits of information in them. These are the guidelines:

Gameplay

Simplicity - Is it easy to understand the general concept / get the hang of, or does it take hours of playing to understand?
Complexity - Does the game have any depth, or is it just simple button mashing?
Fun - Simple- how fun is the game? Do you enjoy playing it, or is it dull and boring?
Replay Value - Is it a game you can play a few times, or one that you'll stay away from after one or two plays?

Presentation

Pixel Art - Simply how the pixel art looks. Is it appealing?
Sounds - Does the game have any sounds? Do they fit well?
Fit - Do they go well together, or do the icons clash and look like they're from other games (or ARE they from other games)?
Originality - Did the staff of the game make the icons / sounds, or did they get them from somewhere else?

Originality

Concept - Was the game's concept thought of by it's creator, or based off an already existing thing?
Programming - Is all of the programming made by the staff of the game, or is some of it not theirs?
Presentation - Are the icons and sounds made by the team of the game, or are they ripped?

Overall

Should be based on the other scores, and also affected by the overall experience the reviewer had playing this game.

---

I think it's a pretty good system; If you guys agree, I'll start reviewing, and others are free to submit reviews as well, as long as they follow these guidelines, and write a non-biased review. However, these guidelines are subject to change.