Fantasie Productions wrote:
EmpirezTeam wrote:
Duhh dipshits. Why would they name it "Hangover 2" if it wasn't going to be like the first one? If they wanted to create an entirely new story, they wouldn't name it the same thing. Thats like saying X-Men 3 is bad because the good mutants fought the bad mutants in 2 and 1. duhh dumbass thats whats supposed to happen, thats why its called X-MEN

Fuck outta heah.

Sorry I must disagree, with each X-MEN movie, a PLOT progresses. Hell 3 was a PREQUEL which means BEFORE the FIRST PLOT! So HANGOVER 2 they were just TRYING to hard to be FUNNY. It came out to be rather obnoxious and a waste of money. Thank god I saw it online.

Did you really just...?

PS: I heres there's 4X more man parts in this one. That's pretty dirt.
Page: 1 2