Before this gets used, I want to make sure it is intended (or at least stable) behavior.
Currently, get_step() with a dir of 0 just gets the turf an atom is on, through any number of nested layers. If my testing is to be trusted, it does this WAY more efficiently than the current method using the empty for loop, etc. I just want to make sure this isn't something that will break before I use it.
Jul 2 2016, 9:36 pm