These two languages are really simple. I like MMF better because you dont have to code anything really. All you gotta code in is the Author, Title stuff. the rest is just click and drag.
Qbasic is neat because it comes with lots os tools for Online RPG's, 2D Side Scroll's, and 3D Shooter. I was thinking of making Abuse 2: The Sequal once Chris confirms the OK
NEwayz, which computer programming language do you like?
(You as in, everyone.)
ID:192283
 Jul 3 2002, 6:56 pm
|
|
|
Jul 3 2002, 7:02 pm
|
|
JordanUl
 |
I have had nothing but trouble from clickteam, do not use it!
|
Qbasic? Dude, that's old school. No way youre that old. Only I am that old. Well, now it's all about Java anyway.
| |
C++ is older then you are my friend. it's old school too just like Qbasic. Java is the new programming language...
| |
basically. you see, java is a better programming language then c++. it's no use to learn that language anymore.
| |
Swordsman Zion wrote:
basically. you see, java is a better programming language Yes, but still extremely useful since it is more-or-less standardized... Java still has some growing pains to go through if only Sun would get off its butt and do it! But, yes, Java is excellent for true OOP. My preference is PHP now because it can be used online *and* offine (PHP-gtk) for application development... | |
digitalmouse wrote:
My preference is PHP now because it can be used online *and* offine (PHP-gtk) for application development... Oooh!!! WHERE?! | |
Swordsman Zion wrote:
basically. you see, java is a better programming language then c++. it's no use to learn that language anymore. Unless you consider the fact that C++ can be used to make applications that, I don't know, what's that word that people use to describe something that functions? Oh, yeah... work! C++ can be used to make applications that work! If the software I'm forced to use at my job, designed and engineered by professional programmers, is any indication... java applications suck major ass, and not in a good way. All the java-based applications I've seen that were anything more than a gimmick, novelty, or toy were some combination of buggy and laggy, and the ones that were windows-based looked like they were a reasonable approximation of a windows application that was programmed by someone who had windows standard operating specs described to them once, but had never actually seen windows in action. A lot of this is probably the fault of the individual software designers, but it's been this way at the last two jobs I've held, so I'm guessing there's something integral to the language that's at least contributing. If anyone who's actually proficient with Java wants to debunk my viewpoint, feel free... but Swordsman Zion's "Java is the new thing" thing is nothing more than what we've been hearing ever since before Java was an applet in Sun's eye. "Java's going to change everything. Java's going to change the way we interact with computers, and the way computers interact with each other. Java will usher in a new age of peace and enlightenment, in which the lion will lay down with the lamb and the races of man will be reunited under a golden rule." Well, it fancied up the internet a bit... but then it kind of stopped. | |
Lesbian Assassin wrote:
Unless you consider the fact that C++ can be used Gotta defend Zion here - Java, as with any other programming language (even DM), is only as good as the programmer who uses it. Many poor Java applications I have seen were developed by guys who were use to coding in C, C++, or VB. Therefore they tried to apply programming concepts to Java that just do not work because Java approaches programming from a very different paradigm - a concise concept of Object-Oriented-Design and -Programming that C++ can partially mimic, much less implement cleanly. The better Java programs I have seen were done by people whose minds were not already locked into the way C and C++ likes to do things. For clean code, true OOP development, and decent rapid-prototyping *without* too much overhead (unless you start wanting to use non-standard java class libraries - then you might have some trouble), Java can do the job if done right. A historically hard-core C/C++ guy will not necessarily write good Java code... Each language has its pros and cons. Something will replace them all eventually... | |
Nadrew wrote:
digitalmouse wrote: Try http://gtk.php.net/ for the home site, and http://gtk.miester.org/ for a decent set of HowTos and tutorials... these are the places where I cut my teeth on PHP-GTK... | |
Swordsman Zion wrote:
basically. you see, java is a better programming language then c++. it's no use to learn that language anymore. Well, actually, C is even older than C++, yet 3/4ths of programming companies use C. As for Java, it was designed for web development. | |